Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD Student, Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.

2 PhD Graduate in Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

3 Full Professor of Agricultural Economics Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Trade Liberalization is a key factor influencing labor market structure that can transform the employment patterns of rural women. The significance of this group's involvement in rural production and livelihoods underscores the necessity of comprehending its impact on their economic participation. The aim of this research is to investigate the effect of trade liberalization on the economic participation rate of rural women in Iran. This study is of an analytical-applied type and was conducted using time series data from 1998 to 2021. The ARDL model was employed to analyze the data, which were collected from reputable statistical sources. The results suggest that, in the long-run, economic participation rate of rural women is positively and significantly impacted by increased trade liberalization. This is due to the fact that trade development can establish a foundation for sustainable employment by expanding export markets, increasing investment, and creating new job opportunities. The findings also indicated that the employment of women is positively influenced by the expansion of the agricultural sector, whereas their participation is adversely affected by an increase in the rural population. Furthermore, the short-term impact of Trade Liberalization was negligible, suggesting that economic and social structures must be adjusted to capitalize on trade opportunities. The results indicate that trade development can establish a foundation for the sustainable employment of rural women by expanding markets, attracting investment, and generating job opportunities. Accordingly, policymakers should prioritize the provision of supportive facilities, the enhancement of communication and financial infrastructure, and the development of occupational skills to enable rural women to participate in international markets.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Akram, S., Faraqat, H., & Hashmi, S. B. (2020). Examining the impact of information and communication technologies on female economic participation in Pakistan. Global Economics Review, V(III), 118-130. https://doi.org/10.31703/ger.2020(V-III).11
Alipour, A., & Yousefi, A. (2023). Investigating the effect of expanding the degree of trade openness of the agricultural sector on rural unemployment in Iran. Agricultural Economics17(1), 55-78.           https://doi.org/10.22034/iaes.2023.563133.1953 (In Persian)
Arbab, H., Mohammadi, T., & Barghamadi, F. (2023). Analysis of the dynamics of trade liberalization on employment. Studies in Economics, Financial Management and Accounting, 9(1), 69-85. (In Persian)
Arman, S. A., Tabae Izadi, A., & Hoseinpour, F. (2008). The Triangle of Financial Development, Economic Growth and International Trade in Iran: A Causation Analysis. Quarterly Journal of Quantitative Economics, 5(3), 107. (In Persian)
Assaf, A. A. (2018). Evaluating the impact of trade openness on women’s job opportunities: An analysis for Middle East countries. Global Journal of Economic and Business4(1), 99-110.
Awad, A. (2019). Economic globalisation and youth unemployment–evidence from African countries. International Economic Journal33(2), 252-269.
Bayeh, E. (2016). The role of empowering women and achieving gender equality to the sustainable development of Ethiopia. Pacific Science Review B: Humanities and Social Sciences2(1), 37-42.
Borhanipour, M. (2006). Globalization and Income Distribution in Iran. Master's Thesis. Faculty of Economics, University of Tehran. (In Persian)
Central Bank (2021). I.R.I. Economic Time Series Database.
Coleman, H. C., & Jenks, K. (2009). Supporting women's roles in agriculture through agricultural research and extension. In Gender, agriculture and rural development (pp. 275-292). Routledge.
Cooray, A., Dutta, N., & Mallick, S. (2017). Trade openness and labor force participation in Africa: the role of political institutions. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society56(2), 319-350.   https://doi.org/10.1111/irel.12175
Davarikish, R., Mehregan, N., & Jafari Seresht, D. (2021). The asymmetric effects of business cycles on womens' employment. Journal of Applied Theories of Economics, 8(2), 239-266. https://doi.org/10.22034/ecoj.2021.45400.2856 (In Persian)
Efobi, U. R., Tanankem, B. V., & Asongu, S. A. (2018). Female economic participation with information and communication technology advancement: Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa. South African Journal of Economics, 86(2), 231-246.
Equality, C. G. (2020). Women’s Empowerment in the context of Food Security and Nutrition. A Scoping Paper.
Fofana, I., Cockburn, J., & Decaluwe, B. (2005). Developing country superwomen: impacts of trade liberalisation on female market and domestic work. CIRPEE Work. Pap. No. 05-19; CIRPEE: Quebec, QC, Canada, 2005.
Fontana, M. (2009). The gender effects of trade liberalization in developing countries: A review of the literature. Rafael E. de Hoyosy Maurizio Bussolo. Gender aspects of the trade and poverty Nexus. A macro-micro approach, (pp. 25–50).
Gaddis, I., & Pieters, J. (2012). Trade liberalization and female labor force participation: Evidence from Brazil. IZA Discussion Paper No. 6809. Germany: IZA.
Grown, C., Braunstein, E., & Malhotra, A. (Eds.). (2006). Trading women's health and rights: trade liberalization and reproductive health in developing economies. Zed Books.
Gupta, A. (2021). Effect of Trade Liberalization on Gender Inequality: The Case of India. IMF Economic Review, 69, 682-720.
Haji-Rahimi, M., Sharaifi, F., & Asaadi, M. A. (2024). The Impact of Climate Change on Cereal Production and Food Security in Iran. Climate Change Research5(20), 65-78. https://doi.org/10.30488/ccr.2024.472319.1238 (In Persian)
International Labour Organization. (2018). Statistics on the informal economy. ILO. Retrieved from: https://www.ilo.org/media/258341/download
International Labour Organization. (2023). The Paradox of Low Female Labor Force Participation. Retrieved from:     https://www.ilo.org/newdelhi/info/public/fs/WCMS_546764/lang--en/index.htm (accessed on 14 June 2023).
Li, Z. Z., Su, C. W., Tao, R., & Hao, L. N. (2019). Enhance or depress? The effect of trade on active females in the labour market. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja32(1), 2680-2698.       https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2019.1653785
Llinares-Insa, L. I., González-Navarro, P., Córdoba-Iñesta, A. I., & Zacarés-González, J. J. (2018). Women’s job search competence: A question of motivation, behavior, or gender. Frontiers in Psychology9, 137.
 
Mohammadi, T., Nazeman, H., & Khodaparast Persarai, Y. (2014). A dynamic causality relation between financial development, trade openness and economic growth: A comparison between Iran and Norway. Iranian Energy Economics3(10), 151-178. (In Persian)
Naderipoor, H., Nabieyan, S., & Jalaee, A. (2018). Studying the effect of business cycle on production, employment, and investment in agricultural sector of Iran. Macroeconomics Research Letter12(24), 73-94.     https://doi.org/10.22080/iejm.2018.1938 (In Persian)
Nica, E., Poliak, M., Alpopi, C., Kliestik, T., Manole, C., & Burlacu, S. (2023). Impact of trade, FDI, and urbanization on female employment system in SAARC: GMM and quantile regression approach. Systems11(3), 137.
Pesaran, H. M., & Shin, Y. (1999). An autoregressive distributed-lag modelling approach to cointegration analysis. In: Strøm, S. (Ed.), Econometrics and Economic Theory in the 20th Century: the Ragnar Frisch Centennial Symposium. Econometric Society Monographs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 371–413.
Sajid, S., & Ullah, S. (2014). Does trade openness boosts gender equality in employment: a case of D8 countries. Glob. & Sci Issues Stud3(2).
Sengupta, S. (2019). The Effect of Trade Liberalization on Marriage and Fertility: Evidence from Indian Districts. Available at SSRN 3440864.
Sengupta, S., & Azam, M. (2024). The effect of trade liberalization on marriage and fertility: evidence from Indian census. Oxford Economic Papers, gpae043.
Shahbazi, K., & Nazarpour, S. (2014). Impacts of export boom on unemployment in Iran. Journal of Applied Economics Studies in Iran3(11), 159-185.         https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.23222530.1393.3.11.7.3 (In Persian)
Shahryaran, F., Nabieian, S., & Mehrani Bashar Abadi, H. (2014). Study the effect of export on employment of agricultural sub-sectors in Iran. Rural Development Strategies1(1), 15-28.        https://doi.org/10.22048/rdsj.2014.5996 (In Persian)
Siddiki, J. U. (2000). Demand for money in Bangladesh: a cointegration analysis. Applied Economics32(15), 1977-1984.
Statistical Center of Iran. (2021). National Statistical Yearbook: Human Resources Chapter.
Statistical Center of Iran. (2021). National Statistical Yearbook: Manpower Season.
Tashkini, A. (2006). Applied Econometrics Using Macrophyte (1st Ed.). Tehran: Dibagaran Cultural and Artistic Institute Publications. (In Persian)
Voumik, L. C. (2019). Trade openness and women participation in the labor market: Evidence from South Asia. Indian Journal of Economics and Development7, 1-10.
Voumik, L. C., Rahman, M. H., Islam, M. A., Chowdhury, M. A. S., & Zimon, G. (2023). The impact of female education, trade openness, per capita GDP, and urbanization on women’s employment in South Asia: Application of CS-ARDL model. Systems11(2), 97.
Voumik, L. C., Rahman, M. H., Islam, M. A., Chowdhury, M. A. S., & Zimon, G. (2023). The impact of female education, trade openness, per capita GDP, and urbanization on women’s employment in South Asia: Application of CS-ARDL model. Systems11(2), 97.
World Bank and World Trade Organization (2020). Women and Trade: The Role of Trade in Promoting Gender Equality. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1541-6_ch1.
Yanikkaya, H. (2003). Trade openness and economic growth: a cross-country empirical investigation. Journal of Development Economics72(1), 57-89.