Woman in Development & Politics

Woman in Development & Politics

Gender Inequality in Iran’s Social Insurance System (2019–2024)

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
1 Assistant professor, Department of Social Studies, Institute for Social and Cultural Studies, Tehran, Iran.
2 . Master of Women studies, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract
The social security system in Iran, which serves as the foundation of welfare policy-making, is structurally based on the "male breadwinner" paradigm. This framework has resulted in the marginalization of a significant portion of the female population and the failure to align its insurance mechanisms with their actual economic livelihoods. The objective of this​ investigation is to investigate gender inequality within Iran's social insurance system, thereby elucidating the current gaps in insurance coverage and access to benefits. It employs a secondary analysis of data from insurance organizations from 2019 to 2025. The data were collected from the statistical yearbooks of the three primary insurance funds in the country, and the results of the 2025 Labour Force Survey were also incorporated. The results suggest that, despite a 5.6% increase in the proportion of female insured individuals over the past six years, a significant disparity in the quality of access to sustainable support continues to exist. In 2025, women comprised only 27% of active contributors to the Social Security Organization, despite their representation of over 49% of the country's population aged 15 to 64. The classification of 91% of women as survivors' pensioners, which is a circumstance that impedes their ability to establish sustained economic independence, is revealed by the distinction between “primary pension recipients” and “derivative” beneficiaries. Furthermore, the “survivorship trap” phenomenon, which has been explicated, illustrates that the 91% concentration is the result of the perpetuation of conventional roles within insurance legislation. Ultimately, the findings confirm the fact that the current insurance system, rather than empowering women as independent agents, tends to perpetuate patterns of subsistence dependency.
Keywords
Subjects

Brimblecombe, S., & McClanahan, S. (2018). Improving gender outcomes in social security retirement systems. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 26(3), 438–461.
Camilletti, E. (2020). Social Protection and Its Effects on Gender Equality: A literature review (Innocenti Working Paper No. 2020-16). UNICEF Office of Research.
Cookson, T. P., Ebner, N., Amron, Y., & Kukreja, K. (2024). Social protection systems and gender: A review of the evidence. Global Social Policy, 24(1), 25–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/14680181231180507
Esmati, Z., Hosseini, L., & Hosseinmardi, M. M. (2023). The position of women's welfare rights in the protective umbrella of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran with an emphasis on social security as a human right. Woman in Development & Politics, 21(3), 693-716.            https://doi.org/10.22059/jwdp.2023.350215.1008268 (In Persian)
Harris, A., & Fasbender, U. (2025). Gender differences in retirement decisions and outcomes: A systematic literature review and recommendations for future research. Work, Aging and Retirement, 11(1), 1–41.  https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/waaf011
Hosseini, R. S., Javid, M., Hosseini, S. M., & Darvishi, B. (2021). Women's claims in Right to Social Security Women's claims and Right to Social Security with emphasis on the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Women's Strategic Studies, 23(91), 49-70.   https://doi.org/10.22095/jwss.2020.214560.2226  (In Persian)
Jones, N. (2021). Gender and social protection. In N. Rohwerder (Ed.), Handbook on Social Protection Systems (pp. 235–250). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Perera, C., Bakrania, S., Ipince, A., Nesbitt-Ahmed, Z., Obasola, O., Richardson, D., Van de Scheur, J., & Yu, R. (2022). Impact of social protection on gender equality in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review of reviews. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 18(2), e1240. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1240
Piovani, C., & Aydiner-Avsar, N. (2015). The gender impact of social protection policies: A critical review of the evidence. Review of Political Economy, 27(3), 410–441.
Razavi, S., et al. (2024). Making social protection work for gender equality: What does it look like? How do we get there? (ILO Working Paper No. 132). International Labour Organization.      https://doi.org/10.54394/QQTE9840  (In Persian)
Tabatabai Hesari, N., Azari, H., & Naderi Afoshteh F. (2020). A comparative study of the principle of equality in the enjoyment of social security benefits for women. Social Welfare Quarterly, 19(75), 87-121. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.17358191.1398.19.75.8.5  (In Persian)
Taj Mazinani, A. A., Ebrahimi, M., & Zokaei, M. S. (2021). Gender Analysis of Social Security Policies in Post- Revolutionary Iran. Social Welfare Quarterly, 20(79), 273-304.  https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.17358191.1399.20.79.6.8  (In Persian)