Working women compared with non-working women in Iran bear a double burden of responsibility. They not only have to bear the traditional unpaid responsibilities of taking care of children and household chores they also have to bear the responsibilities of performing duties associated with their paid job outside the home. The double burden of responsibility for the working women refers to the amount of work they do at home and outside the home comparedwith non-working women. This article aims to quantify the additional work the Iranian employed women do based on the number of their dependent children under the age of 7 years. To do this, a comparison between the time allocated for paid and unpaid works by, respectively, working and non-working married women is made. The required data for the analysis was provided by the Iranian National Center for Statistics. The results indicated that married working women with 0, 1 and 2 children work 3 hours and 6 minutes, 1 hour and 42 minutes and 1 hour and 29 minutes, respectively, more than their non-working counterparts. The results also indicate that with an increase in the number dependent children the relative intensity of double burden of working women decreases.
Ghazi_Tabatabaea, M. and Mehri, N. (2013). The Impact of Women’s Employmen on Fertility in Iran. Woman in Development & Politics, 11(1), 29-44. doi: 10.22059/jwdp.2013.35473
MLA
Ghazi_Tabatabaea, M. , and Mehri, N. . "The Impact of Women’s Employmen on Fertility in Iran", Woman in Development & Politics, 11, 1, 2013, 29-44. doi: 10.22059/jwdp.2013.35473
HARVARD
Ghazi_Tabatabaea, M., Mehri, N. (2013). 'The Impact of Women’s Employmen on Fertility in Iran', Woman in Development & Politics, 11(1), pp. 29-44. doi: 10.22059/jwdp.2013.35473
CHICAGO
M. Ghazi_Tabatabaea and N. Mehri, "The Impact of Women’s Employmen on Fertility in Iran," Woman in Development & Politics, 11 1 (2013): 29-44, doi: 10.22059/jwdp.2013.35473
VANCOUVER
Ghazi_Tabatabaea, M., Mehri, N. The Impact of Women’s Employmen on Fertility in Iran. Woman in Development & Politics, 2013; 11(1): 29-44. doi: 10.22059/jwdp.2013.35473