Document Type : Research Paper


Department of Social Science Group, Women and Family Research Institute, Tehran, Iran.


Policy-making is a tool in the hands of rulers to turn the objective challenges of society into scientific problems and solve them. Therefore, it is worthwhile to benefit from the transition policy from the point of view of the target community as a large and significant part of actors and stakeholders in the decision-making process. Meanwhile, women, as a vital part of the active body of society and direct involvement with the dynamic institution of the family, play a crucial role in recognizing and solving problems in all public spheres. The Islamic Republic, as a transcendent government, which is a system based on religious democracy, will need to pay attention to this part of the actors and facilitate their public participation in the processes of problem recognition, decision-making and monitoring. For this purpose, we need to enumerate the components of this participation from the perspective of religious discourse to achieve the Islamic requirements for women's public participation in the process of forming an Islamic governance. In this study, with the aim of extracting these components, the qualitative method and thematic analysis strategy have been used. To answer the main question of the research, 13 in-depth interviews were conducted with religious experts overlooking the women's activism space with a practical or theoretical background in policy-making. Data analysis in the coding process led to the emergence of 48 basic themes in the form of 10 organizing themes and 2 Global themes and presenting a network of themes. Findings showed that the Islamic conceptual pattern of women's social body participation in the policy-making process of women include two Global dimensions of participation components and participation mechanisms. components include: Purposefulness, problem-oriented, social body leveling, religiosity and divinity, and allocation of arenas and boundaries. Mechanisms include the following: legality and legitimacy, generalization and de-genderization, empowerment, intermediary institutions and specialized institutions.
In prescribing the practical Islamic model of women's participation in this approach, it should be noted that being political in the objective component, with the issue of politicization in recognizing the issue despite the Proximity of word, have a clear conceptual difference and application, so that the explanation of the problem in the objective component is related to the political issue. It is for the purpose and goal of preserving the Islamic system, while the theme of politicization in the problem-oriented component looks at the form and manner of interaction of the policy maker with the social body. This damage appears in the bias of this process from the discourse of political parties and currents in the agenda setting and identifying important issues for attention and policy making.
Prescribing the mechanism of generality and degendering of social body participation arrangements in the process of policy making and problem recognition in this area should also be done under the two components of purposefulness and allocation of arenas. In this sense, just doing righteous deeds in Islamic governance, which has strengthened the Islamic system, is recommended and prescribed in all fields regardless of gender in the religious approach, and the assigned boundaries in Islam only determine the way of participation in these public fields. Using the purely legal capacity and legitimacy of the prescriptive mechanisms also allows the creation of innovative legal structures such as intermediary circles with newer approaches to manage the fields of public activism and public satisfaction to claimants and experts along with the social body. In this approach, by looking at the successful structures in other governance models in interaction with the social body of women, it is possible to design and implement successful internal models within religious frameworks. In the end, what seems to be necessary in this matter is the creation of expert institutions and the need to add analytical and research attachments to the field of women and family policymaking at all stages and to achieve all components and mechanisms. This capacity, on the one hand, to create theoretical and practical coherence in Islamic governance, and on the other hand, in order to manage existing demands and make demands based on the present and future needs of the Islamic society, will be one of the advantages of expert actions.


Main Subjects

Abdul Hamid, M., & Daders, F. (2018). The book of selected essays of the first national conference on Islamic governance (Volume 1) the Higher National Defense University Publications, Da'a Press. (In Persian)
Aghazadeh, M. R., Asgari, T., Shahi, A., & Farahmand, A. (2016). Designing strategy formulation processing model of governmental organizations based on network governance. Quarterly Journal of Public Organizations Management4(1), 29-52. (In Persian)
Alwani, S. M., & Sharifzadeh, F. (2006). Public policymaking process (3rd Ed.). Tehran: Allameh Tabatabai University. (In Persian)
Amir al-Momenin Ali (AS) (2007). Nahj al-Balagha. Compiled by Seyyed Sharif Razi. Translated by: A. M. Ayati. Publications of Nahj al-Balagha Foundation. (In Persian)
Amir al-Momenin Ali (AS). Nahj al-Balagha. Compiled by Seyyed Sharif Razi. Translated by: M. Dashti. Tehran: Amir al-Momenin (AS) Cultural Research Institute. Payam Adalat Publications. (In Persian)
Amiri, A. N., Hassan Danaifar, H., Zarei Mateen, H., & Emami, S. M. (2013). Understanding the essence of public policies: theoretical analysis of the nature of imitability of national policy makers. Quarterly of Strategic Management Thought, 9, 5-44. (In Persian)
Armstrong, M. (2010). Armstrongs Handbook of Reward Management: Improving Performance Through Reward (3rd Ed.). UK: Koganpage.
Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: An Analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1, 385-405
Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: thematic analysis and code development. Sage.
Brewer, G. D. (1974). Policy Sciences Emerge-Nurture and Structure a Discipline. Policy Sciences, 5(3), 239–244.
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Thematic analysis. Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. Hoboken, New Jersey: Springer: 843–860. 
Bridgman, P., & Davis, G. (2003). What use is a policy cycle? Plenty, if the aim is clear. Australian Journal of Public Administration62(3), 98-102.
Cobb, R., & Elder, C. (1983). Agenda-Building and Democratic Politics. Baltimore. MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Fifth edition. Los Angeles: SAGE.
Daneshfard, K., & Kiyayei, M. (2010). Participation of citizens in public policy making. Public Policy in Administration, 1(3), 143-163. (In Persian)
Dabirnia, A., & Asadabadi, T. (2016). Popular Sovereignty in Political Thought of WEST and Islam; Democratic System and Shari’a Based System in Iranian Constitution. Comparative Study on Islamic & Western Law, 3(3), 25-50. (In Persian)
Deleon, P. (1999). The Stages Approach to the Policy Process: What Has It Done? Where Is It Going? In: Sabatier, P.A. (ed.) Theories of the Policy Process: Theoretical Lenses on Public Policy. Boulder, Colo: Westview Press, pp. 19–33.
Delshad Tehrani, M. (2000). Government of Hikmat (government of Wisdom). Tehran, Publisher: Khane Andisheh Javan.
Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological method. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Eliasi, M. (2017). The Emanation of Divine Sovereignty in the Articles of IRI Constitution. Islamic Revolution Studies, 14(48), 109-126. (In Persian)
Fakhlai, M. T. (2007). Re-reading contemporary jurisprudential opinions about political legitimacy. Islamic Theology and Education (Islamic Studies), 69, 101-154. (In Persian)
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Ghadrdan Maleki, M. H. (2000). Religious government from the perspective of Shahid Motahari. Tehran: Research Center for Islamic Culture and Thought. (In Persian)
Habitat, U. N. (2002). The global campaign on urban governance: concept paper. Nairobi, Kenya: United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat).
Johnson, T. (1997). Redefining the Consept of Governance.
Kazemi, S. H., Salimi, N., Sadeghi Fasaei, S., & Shakeri Golpayegani, T. (2020). Discourse Analysis as a Framework for Identifying the Characteristics of Gender Justice Policy-Making in Iran. Gender and Family Studies7(2), 62-100. (In Persian)
Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A. & Mastruzzi, M. (2007). The Worldwide governance indicators project: Answering the critics. The World Bank, Washington DC.
Khadzhyradieva, S., Hrechko, T., & Savkov, A. (2019). Behavioral insights in public policy: Ukrainian case. Public Policy and Administration, 18(1), 85-99.
Khosravi, M., Daheshyar, H., & Abtahi, S. S. (2013). The Empowerment of Women in Making Political Decisions in National and International Decision Makings Structure. Research Letter of International Relations5(20), 99-132. (In Persian)
King, N., & Horrocks, C. (2010). Interviews in qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA, US: SAGE Publications.
Kismartini, K., & Pujiyono, B. (2020). Collaborative Management Model Tanjung Lesung Tourism in Pandeglang District, Banten Province, Indonesia. Geo Journal of Tourism and Geosites30, 868-874.
Kjær, A. M. (2006). Governance (key concepts). Translated by: E. Golshan & A. Adosi. Tehran: Institute for Research & Planning in Higher Education. (In Persian)
Kooiman, J. (1999). Social-political governance: overview, reflections and design. Public Management an International Journal of Research and Theory1(1), 67-92.
Lasswell, H. D. (1972). Communications research and public policy. Public Opinion Quarterly36(3), 301-310.
Lester, J. P., & Stewart, J. J. (2004). Public policy: An evolutionary approach. Translated by: M. Tabari et al., Tehran: Svalan. (In Persian)
Lindblom, C. E. (1984). The policy-making process (2nd Ed.). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Maghsudi, M., & Ghallehdar, S. (2012). Political Participation of Afghanistan Women in the New Structure of Power in Post 11 September Event. Research Letter of International Relations4(17), 179-210. (In Persian)
Mirhosseini, Z., & Zahra Koohpeyma Ronizi, Z. (2021). Women’s Perceived Understanding of Issues in the Domain of Family: A Case Study of Women in Fasa, Iran. Strategic Research on Social Problems in Iran10(1), 71-98. (In Persian)
Mirzamani, A., Akhavan Alavi, S. H., Amiri, A. N., & Esmaili, H. (2018). Understanding the process of tax policy in Iran: factors affecting tax regulation at the national level and its actors. Journal of Iranian National Tax Administration, 25(36), 211-249. (In Persian)
Mohhamadi, M. (2001). Journal of  Law and political science, 54(1), 137-154.. (In Persian)
Mohammadpour, A. (2018). Qualitative research method against method. Tehran: Sociologists Publishing. (In Persian)
Norse, D., & Tschirley, J. B. (2000). Links between Science and Policy Making. Agriculture. Journal of Ecosystems & Environment, 82, 15–26.
Oneal, S. (1998). The Phenomenon of Total Rewards. ACA Journal, 7(3), 8-14.
Pirivesi, M., Shirkhani, A., & Torabi, M. (2018). Pathology of the role of women in policy-making with an approach to citizenship rights and providing appropriate solutions. Journal of Bioethics, 31, 122-137. (In Persian)
Pourezzat, A. A. (2015). Linguistic justice, the turning point of the narration of justice in Nahj al-Balagha. Tehran: Nahj al-Balagha Foundation Publications. (In Persian)
Quevauviller, P., Balabanis, P., Fragakis, C., Weydert, M., Oliver, M., Kaschl, A., ... & Bidoglio, G. (2005). Science-policy integration needs in support of the implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive. Environmental Science & Policy8(3), 203-211.
Quiggin, J. (2019). Economics in Two Lessons: Why Markets Work So Well, and Why They Can Fail So Badly. Princeton University Press.
Rahbar, A., & Haydari, F. (2011). Impact of Social Capital on Promotion of Policy-making. Research Letter of International Relations4(14), 219-253. (In Persian)
Safdari Ranjbar, M., Karim Mian, Z., & Attarpour M. R. (2021). Transition to the New Generation of Government Research Organizations; Functions and Policies. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 15(4), 53-69. (In Persian)
Santiso, C. (2002). Governance Conditionality and the Reform of Multilateral Development Finance: The Role of the Group of Eight. G8 Governance Number 7.
Shamsini Gheyasvand, H., & Najafi Jouybari, K. (2016). Analyzing the political participation of women in the Islamic world; with emphasis on the country of Egypt. Political Studies of Islamic World5(3), 89-116. (In Persian)
Valizadeh, A. (2014). Comparison of the foundations and indicators of religious democracy with liberal democracy. National Conference on Future Studies. Human Sciences and Development, Shiraz. (In Persian)
Wu, X., Ramesh, M., Howlett, M., & Fritzen, S. A. (2017). The public policy primer: Managing the policy process. Routledge.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Third Edition, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
Young, J., & Mendizabel, E. (2009). Helping researchers become policy entrepreneurs. London, UK: Overseas Development Institute.