زن در توسعه و سیاست

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

درباره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

اعضای هیات تحریریه

اصول اخلاقی انتشار مقاله

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پیوندهای مفید

پرسش‌های متداول

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

تماس با ما

اخبار و اعلانات

راهنمای تنظیم مقاله

شرایط و ضوابط ارسال مقاله

فرم ها و فایل های ضروری نشریه

سازوکارهای مشروعیت‌بخشی به قدرت جنسیتی (مورد مطالعه: زنان شهر ایوان)

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استاد، گروه جامعه‌شناسی و مطالعات فرهنگی، دانشکدۀ ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه ایلام، ایلام، ایران.

2 دانشیار، گروه جامعه‌شناسی و مطالعات فرهنگی، دانشکدۀ ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه ایلام، ایلام، ایران.

3 استادیار، گروه آموزش علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه فرهنگیان، تهران، ایران

4 کارشناس ارشد، گروه جامعه‌شناسی و مطالعات فرهنگی، دانشکدۀ ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه ایلام، ایلام، ایران.

چکیده

در شهرهای کم‌جمعیت، عرف نقش برجسته‌ای در امور زندگی ایفا می‌کند؛ زیرا همبستگی مکانیکی در این‌گونه مکان‌ها به‌وفور مشاهده می‌شود و هنجارها، ارزش‌ها و ارتباطات اجتماعی بین دو جنس را تحت تأثیر قرار می‌دهد. هدف پژوهش حاضر واکاوی سازوکارهای مشروعیت‌بخشی به قدرت جنسیتی از منظر زنان شهر ایوان در چارچوب خانواده است. این پژوهش براساس پارادایم تفسیری و رویکرد کیفی و با استفاده از مدل اشتراوس و کربن انجام شده است. میدان مطالعه شامل زنان شهر ایوان است. نمونه‌یابی به روش نمونه‌گیری هدفمند از نوع گلوله‌برفی انجام گرفت و نمونه‌گیری تا مرحلۀ اشباع نظری ادامه یافت. با 20 نفر مصاحبه به عمل آمد و از مصاحبۀ نیمه‌ساختاریافته برای گردآوری اطلاعات استفاده شد. فرمت داده‌ها در قالب متن بود و در تحلیل داده‌ها کدگذاری سه‌مرحله‌ای باز، محوری و گزینشی به‌کار گرفته شد. از عبارت‌های معنایی 233 مفهوم، 30 زیرمقوله و 13 مقولۀ اصلی به‌دست آمد. مقولۀ هسته «هم‌کناری گفتمان عرف و دین» نام‌گذاری شد. این مقوله به معنای همجواری دو نوع گفتمان عرف و دین است که وقتی در جامعه به‌عنوان مرجع تلقی می‌شوند می‌توانند مشروعیت‌بخشی قدرت جنسیتی را تحکیم و تقویت کنند. گرچه در همۀ جوامع این هم‌کناری به‌طور نسبی دیده می‌شود، با توجه به ایدئولوژیک‌شدن گفتمان دین در جامعۀ ایران (به‌مثابۀ ایدئولوژی سیاسی) این مشروعیت‌بخشی به قدرت جنسیتی دوچندان شده است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Mechanisms of Legitimizing Gender Power (Case study: Women of Eyvan Town)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Yarmohammad Ghasemi 1
  • zahra rezaeinasab 2
  • Fatemeh Havas Beigi 3
  • Akhtar Mahmoodi 4

1 Full Professor, Department of Sociology and Cultural Studies, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Ilam, Ilam, Iran.

2 Associate Professor, Department of Sociology and Cultural Studies, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Ilam, Ilam, Iran.

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran.

4 Master’s Degree Graduate, Department of Sociology and Cultural Studies, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Ilam, Ilam, Iran.

چکیده [English]

In less densely populated cities, tradition significantly influences various aspects of life, as mechanical interactions are frequently observed in these environments. This dynamic impacts the norms, values, and social relationships between the two genders. The aim of this research is to analyze the mechanisms through which gender power is legitimized from the perspective of women residing in the townof Eyvan, within the framework of familial structures. This research is anchored in the interpretive paradigm and employs a qualitative approach, utilizing the grounded theory methodology. The research encompasses women residing in the town of Eyvan, employing a purposive snowball sampling method. This sampling process persisted until theoretical saturation was achieved, resulting in a total of 20 interviews conducted. A semi-structured interview methodology has been used to collect information, with the data presented in textual format. The analysis of the data has been conducted utilizing a three-stage coding process, comprising open, axial, and selective coding. From the semantic expressions, a total of 233 concepts, 30 subcategories, and 13 primary categories were obtained. The principal category was designated as “The coexistence of religious and customary discourse,” signifying the simultaneous presence of two forms of customary-religious discourses that, when regarded as societal references, have the potential to reinforce and legitimize gender power dynamics. Although this coexistence is observed across various societies, the ideological framing of religious discourse within Iranian society—as a political ideology—has significantly intensified the legitimization of gender power.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Eyvan Town
  • Gender Power
  • Grounded Theory
  • Legitimization
  • The Coexistence of Religious and Customary Discourse
مراجع
Adib Haj Bagheri, M. (2006). Grounded Theory Research Method (Theory Development Method in Humanities and Health Sciences). Tehran: Boshra.
Ahmad, N. (2023). Understanding Gender Power Relations and Emotions of Rohingya Adolescent Girls in Bangladesh. Journal of Gender and Power, 19(1), 31-48. https://doi.org/10.14746/jpg.2023.19.1.3
Ahmadi, L., & Nabavi, S. A. (2008). Investigating the impact of social factors on symbolic gender inequality in the family (inequality in decision-making power). Iranian Journal of Sociology, 8(2) 59-82. (In Persian)
Ahmadi, S., & Hosseina’i, S. H. (2019). Investigating the relationship between cultural capital and parents' tendency to gender discrimination (A case study of parents in Javanroud city), Iran Social Issues Survey, 7(1), 56-27. (In Persian)
Akhter, T. (2020). Gender and Literature: A Contemporary Issue. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 510, 6th International Conference on Social and Political Sciences (ICOSAPS 2020).     http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201219.090
AlBarzi, M. (2015). Sufferings of loneliness: mechanisms of social exclusion of female heads of the Imam Khomeini (RA) Aid Committee, Rasht city. Master’s thesis in sociology, Gilan University, Iran. (In Persian)
Allen J. (2003). Lost Geographies of Power. Oxford: Blackwell.
Bakhtiari, H., Hazrati Soumeh, Z., & Vadieh, S. (2022). A sociological study of the impact of gender inequality on cultural development (Case study: Female students of Islamic Azad Universities in Tehran). Iranian Journal of Social Development Studies, 14(3), 222-238. (In Persian)
Bardall, G. (2020). Symbolic Violence as a Form of Violence against Women in Politics: A Critical Examination. International Foundation for Electoral Systems, Mexico, 238, 379-389.
Chitsazi, E& Hassan Lee, K. (2019). The structure of power in the family and its representation in Persian folk tales. Culture and Folk Literature, 7(26), 175-205. (In Persian)
Churcill, S. A., Nuha, A. S., & Lopez, K. (2019). Persistence of gender inequality: the role of ethnic divisions. Applied Economics. Taylor & Francis Online, 51(8), 781-796.   https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2018.1513635
 Craib, I. (2016). Modern social theory: From Parsons to Habermas (10th Ed.). Translated by: A. Mokhber. Tehran: Agah Publishing House. (In Persian)
Dahal, P., Joshi, S. K., & Swahnberg, K. (2022). A qualitative study on gender inequality and gender-based violence in Nepal. BMC Public Health, 22(1), 2005.
Daigle, M. (2022). Gender, power and principles in humanitarian action. HPG report. London. https://odi.org/en/publications/gender-power-and-principles-in-humanitarian-action/
Dehghan Tarzjaani, F., Sojoodi, F., Nojoumian, A. A., & Babak Moein, M. (2021). Mechanisms of Legitimizing Gender Discourses in Mahmoud Dowlatabad’s Novel “Solouk”. Language Related Research, 11(6), 1-34. http://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.23223081.1399.11.6.7.6 (In Persian)
 Esrafili, E. (2016). How women interact with each other in the family and its effect on the reproduction of gender inequality, master's thesis in sociology. Al-Zahra University (S), Iran. (In Persian)
Farahmand, M., & Baharloui, M. (2022). Strategies of resistance and rethinking: Women's experience in the process of gender inequality within the family. Quarterly Journal of Social Development, 16(3), 27-62. https://doi.org/10.22055/qjsd.2022.32512.2158 (In Persian)
Garrison-Desany, H. M., Wilson, E., Munos, M., Sawadogo-Lewis, T., Maïga, A., Ako, O., ... & Morgan, R. (2021). The role of gender power relations on women’s health outcomes: evidence from a maternal health coverage survey in Simiyu region, Tanzania. BMC Public Health, 21, 1-15.           https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10972-w
Ghasemi, Y., & Havas Beigi, F. (2019). Power and culture, (confrontation of views). Tehran: Sociologists Publications. (In Persian)
Giddens, A. (2010). Sociology. Translated by: H. Chavoshian. Tehran: Ney Publication. (In Persian)
Hosseinaei, A., & Kaviani, M. (2018). Predicting emotional divorce based on decision-making styles and family power structure in working women. Women and Family Studies, 7(3), 151-129. https://doi.org/10.22051/jwfs.2019.21896.1848 (In Persian)
Jayachandran, S. (2014). The roots of gender inequality in developing countries. NBER working paper series, National Bureau of Economic Research.
Kilburg, R. R. (2020). Gender power and the psychodynamics of envy in leadership. The Psychologist-Manager Journal, 23(3-4), 206–229.          https://doi.org/10.1037/mgr0000105.
 Kim, S. Y. (2021). Determining critical factors of gender inequality: Evidence from 34 OECD and non-OECD countries. World Development Perspectives, 21, 100284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wdp.2020.100284
Klasen, S. (2018). The Impact of Gender Inequality on Economic Performance in Developing Countries. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 10, 279-298.
Koester, D. (2015). Gender & Power. Developmental Leadership Program. www.dlprog.org
Lokot, M. (2023). Gendered Power Struggles beyond the Male-Female Dichotomy. Anthropology of the Middle East, 18(1), 35–55.           https://doi.org/10.3167/ame.2023.180104
Mehdizadeh, S., & Azarbara Gazaz, S. (2012). Analysis of the content of the image of women in Iranian TV commercials. Master's thesis in Sociology, Al-Zahra University (S), Iran. (In Persian)
Mihira, L. S. N., Suwastini, N. K. A., Artini, N. N., Jayantini, I. G. A. S. R., & Budiarta, I. W. (2021). Gender Inequality Represented in English Textbooks: a Literature Review. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 10(3), 576-596.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jish-undiksha.v10i3.39209
Mir Hosseini, Z., Ebrahimi, M., & Pakdel, P. (2021). Investigating factors affecting the power of women in the family. Family Research Quarterly, 17(68), 539-523. https://doi.org/10.52547/JFR.17.4.523 (In Persian)
Mohammadpour, A. (2013). The experience of modernization, studying change and development in Huraman using the grounded theory method. Tehran: Sociologists. (In Persian)
Nasseri, S., & Piri, S. (2017). Grounded Theory: A Method for the Scientific and Practical Study of Development and Social Change. Iranian Journal of Social Development Studies, 9(4), 8-20.  https://sanad.iau.ir/Journal/jisds/Article/821477 (In Persian)
Nisak, S. S., & Sugiharti, L. (2020). Gender inequality and women poverty in Indonesia. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 11(9), 375-387.        https://repository.unair.ac.id/123872/1/LilikSugiharti_Artikel208_.pdf
Ozbay, C., & Soyakis, O. (2020). Political Masculinities: Gender, Power, and Change in Turkey. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 27(1), 27-50. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxy/jxy040
Paul, U. K., & Bandyopadhyay, A. (2018). Qualitative Research: Ethical Issues. Bengal Physician Journal, 5(3), 45-47.
Rammohan, A., & Vu, P. (2018). Gender inequality in education and kinship norms in India. Feminist Economics, 24(1), 142-167.         https://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/redir.pf?u=https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.org%2F10.1080%252F13545701.2017.1364399;h=repec:taf:femeco:v:24:y:2018:i:1:p:142-167
Rastgouyan, I. (2015). Gender inequality: a challenge on the way to Iran's progress. Collection of selected works and articles of the 10th Congress of Progress Pioneers. 3847-3842. (In Persian)
Ritzer, G. (1995). Sociological theory in the contemporary era. Translated by: M. Salassi. Tehran: Elmi. (In Persian)
Seidman, S. (2006). Conflict of Votes in Sociology. Translated by: H. Jalili. Tehran: Ney Publication. (In Persian)
Sharifi Saei, M., & Azad Aramaki, T. (2021), Women's strength and resistance in Iranian family: women's narrative of cultural resistance methods in the family. Iranian Cultural Research Quarterly, 14(1), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.22035/jicr.2021.2676.3081 (In Persian)
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2011). Fundamentals of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Stages of Grounded Theory Production. Translated by: E. Afshar. Tehran: Ney Publication. (In Persian)
Watson, L. (2014). Gender justice for all: Achieving just and equitable power relations between women and men. London: The Free Press.
Wood, H. J. (2019). Gender inequality: The problem of harmful, patriarchal, traditional and cultural gender practices in the church. HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies, 75(1).        http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/hts.v75i1.5177
Zhou, S. (2023). Gender Politics and Power Structure: An Analysis of Institutional Barriers to Gender Equality. Journal of Research in Social Science and Humanities, 2(10), 64-71.  http://dx.doi.org/10.56397/JRSSH.2023.10.08
زن در توسعه و سیاست
دوره 23، شماره 1
فروردین 1404
صفحه 1-34
فایل ها
هم رسانی
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار