نوع مقاله : پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشگاه تهران-دانشکده حکمرانی
2 رشته حکمرانی خانواده/ دانشکده حکمرانی/ دانشگاه تهران
چکیده
اصلاحات حقوقی حوزه زنان در دوره پهلوی دوم، از جمله اعطای حق رأی در سال ۱۳۴۲ و تصویب قوانین حمایت از خانواده در ۱۳۴۶ و ۱۳۵۳، در چارچوب پروژه مدرنیزاسیون دولتی و با هدف ارتقای موقعیت سیاسی و اجتماعی زنان اجرا شد؛ با اینحال، این مداخلات نتوانستند به مشارکت معنادار یا نهادینهسازی پایدار حقوق زنان بینجامند و بخش قابلتوجهی از دستاوردهای آنها پس از انقلاب ۱۳۵۷ بازگشتپذیر شد. این پژوهش با بهرهگیری از نظریه «انطباق رفتوبرگشتی مسئلهمحور» (PDIA)، علل این ناکامی را در سطوح فرایندی و ساختاری بررسی میکند. مطالعه حاضر با رویکرد کیفی و روش تحلیل تاریخی–تطبیقی انجام شده و دادهها از طریق تحلیل اسناد حقوقی، مشروح مذاکرات قانونگذاری و منابع تاریخی گردآوری و با کدگذاری باز، محوری و انتخابی تحلیل شدهاند. یافتهها نشان میدهد اصلاحات مزبور بهجای اتکا بر مسئلهمحوری، بر تقلید شکلی از الگوهای غربی، اجرای سریع و بالا به پایین و فقدان مشارکت واقعی ذینفعان متکی بودهاند و بهدلیل بیتوجهی به زمینههای فرهنگی–اجتماعی و ضعف ظرفیتسازی نهادی، فاقد پشتوانه تثبیتکننده بودهاند. تحلیل حاضر بیان میکند که پایداری اصلاحات جنسیتی نیازمند طراحی مبتنی بر شناسایی دقیق مسئله، بومیسازی تدریجی راهکارها، بهرهگیری از بازخورد مستمر و تقویت ظرفیتهای حکمرانی است؛ رویکردی که میتواند از تکرار چرخه شکست اصلاحات نمایشی جلوگیری کند.
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
The Fragility of Gender Policies in Second Pahlavi Iran: An Analysis of Women's Suffrage and Family Protection Law Based on PDIA Theory
نویسندگان [English]
- Fateme Zeynodini 1
- Zahra Abbaspour 2
1 University of Tehran/ Faculty of Governance
2 Family governance/ Faculty of Governance/ University of Tehran
چکیده [English]
This article delivers an extensive and critical analysis of the social reforms implemented in Iran during the Second Pahlavi era, with a strong focus on two primary reform areas: women’s suffrage and family protection laws. The study employs the theoretical framework of Problem-Driven Iterative Adaptation (PDIA) to examine the design, execution, and ramifications of these reforms within the distinctive socio-political and cultural contexts of mid-20th century Iran. The PDIA framework underscores the imperative of basing reforms on authentic social issues, fostering adaptability in reform implementation, and advancing changes incrementally and iteratively for durable and effective outcomes.
Historically, these reforms took place amid significant global and domestic transformations regarding gender rights and broader social modernization trends characteristic of the mid-1900s. The Second Pahlavi era marked momentous steps such as the enfranchisement of women in 1963 and the enactment of family protection legislation in 1967 and 1974. These reforms were cornerstones of the regime’s broader modernization and development agenda. However, despite aligning with international movements toward gender equality and political inclusion, the Iranian socio-cultural fabric presented distinctive challenges to their seamless integration and success.
Through meticulous qualitative and comparative analyses of legal documents, parliamentary debates, historical narratives, and prior academic research, this study unearths the intricate interplay between ambitious reformist aspirations and entrenched social realities. While on paper these reforms appeared progressive, the analysis reveals they largely failed to fulfill their intended goals. Key factors responsible for these shortcomings include the uncritical adoption of external reform models without appropriate localization, a neglect of Iran’s deep-rooted cultural and religious norms, and the limited institutional capacity of governance bodies to effectively enforce and sustain these legal changes.
One of the dominant forces shaping reform outcomes was religious and traditional opposition. Many influential clerics and conservative factions viewed reforms—especially those advancing women’s suffrage and family law changes—as threats to Islamic values and traditional family structures. This resistance manifested through various channels, including public declarations, religious edicts, and societal censure targeting politically engaged women. The persistent opposition highlighted the entrenched patriarchal power relations within Iranian society and emphasized the cultural disconnect between imposed reforms and the broader population’s values and beliefs.
Furthermore, the article explores the dynamics of women’s political mobilization and organization during this period. Women’s associations, many of which were closely aligned with the state apparatus, sought to champion reformist causes but faced significant challenges regarding legitimacy and representation. Their governmental affiliation often alienated them from wider female constituencies, resulting in a fragmented feminist discourse and diminishing the robustness of their advocacy for genuine women’s empowerment.
A pivotal contribution of this research is the application of PDIA’s problem-oriented framework to critically evaluate the reform trajectory. PDIA insists on precisely identifying underlying societal issues before designing interventions, providing clarity on why the top-down, imported reforms failed to resonate effectively within the Iranian context. Its emphasis on iterative learning and adaptation underscores missed opportunities where gradual, culturally congruent reforms might have enabled smoother, more sustainable social progress.
The study also critically examines the execution capabilities of the Pahlavi regime’s governance structures, highlighting significant deficiencies. Weak administrative and judicial mechanisms, compounded by insufficient public education efforts and low political readiness among women, severely hampered the effective implementation of reforms. The fast-paced and at times coercive implementation approach further catalyzed backlash and societal fragmentation, undermining reform legitimacy and effectiveness.
Analysis of family protection laws reveals similar shortcomings; top-down policy formulation failed to accommodate dominant social norms and values. Legal measures aimed at regulating divorce, limiting polygamy, and augmenting women’s rights within the family sphere incited controversy, provoking vigorous opposition from religious authorities and various societal segments. Although inspired by advanced Western legal principles and progressive in intent, these laws were widely perceived as unwelcome state intrusions into sacred religious and social institutions, thereby exacerbating tensions and resistance.
Moreover, the article discusses the profound gap between formal legal enactments and the lived realities of women and families. Persistent patriarchal resistance, limited access to legal support, and social pressures that discouraged political and legal activism stymied the transformative potential of legislative reforms. This disconnect severely constrained modernization effects envisioned by reformists and exposed the limits of legal reforms in reaching marginalized groups within Iranian society.
Positioning these findings within a broader governance and development framework, the article engages with scholarly discourse on institutional change and policy adaptation in developing contexts. It identifies the Pahlavi reforms as exemplary cases of PDIA-described reform challenges: superficial external model mimicry (isomorphic mimicry), disregard for local political economies, and failure to cultivate deep implementation capacities. This analytical stance elucidates why even bold reforms can falter without appropriate contextual embedding and institutional development.
Additionally, the article sheds light on how these reform efforts were entangled with political calculations, where reforms were sometimes employed as tools to placate international opinion or manage social tensions without fully committing to their deep structural enactment. This politicization further complicated the reform processes, restricting their transformative potential and entrenching skepticism among both reform advocates and traditional opponents.
Drawing upon these insights, the article concludes by outlining recommendations for shaping future reform initiatives in Iran and similar socio-political milieus. It stresses the urgent need to customize reforms to local cultural, social, and political realities while actively engaging stakeholders to build societal legitimacy and ownership. Incremental policy design coupled with adaptive implementation methods consistent with PDIA’s iterative principles are urged to effectively navigate complex social challenges. Strengthening governance structures—particularly legal, administrative, and judicial institutions—emerges as a cornerstone for fostering and sustaining successful reforms.
In summation, this article makes a substantive contribution by providing a theory-driven, empirically grounded evaluation of mid-century Iranian women’s rights and family law reforms. By bridging historical context with contemporary governance theory, it advances knowledge of the complexities and pitfalls of reform processes in traditional societies facing pressures to modernize. The study reinforces that meaningful social reforms—especially those targeting gender and family—must be culturally embedded and institutionally supported for enduring impact. Its insights offer valuable lessons not only for scholars and policymakers concerned with Iranian development but also for global actors engaged in gender-equity legal reform efforts within culturally complex environments.
کلیدواژهها [English]
- Women’s suffrage
- Family protection laws
- Social reforms
- (PDIA) theory
- Social reforms of the Second Pahlavi era
)