تابع عرضۀ خانه‌داری زنان متأهل در شهر تهران

مهربانی, وحید

doi:10.22059/jwdp.2016.59197

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

وحید مهربانی

استادیار دانشگاه تهران، دانشکدۀ اقتصاد

https://doi.org/10.22059/jwdp.2016.59197

چکیده

در نظریۀ اقتصادی متعارف، به تولید خانگی و خدمات ارائه‌شده در داخل خانوار چندان توجه نمی‏شود، زیرا آنچه در خانوارها تولید و مصرف می‏شود ارزش اقتصادی ندارد و در محاسبات ملی اقتصادی وارد نمی‏شود. این در حالی است که خانواده محل شکل‏گیری بسیاری از کالاها و خدمات ارزشمند است که در تعیین رفاه مردم جامعه نقشی برجسته دارند و زنان در کانون این بحث‌اند. از‌این‌رو، در این مقاله برای تحلیل فعالیت مهم و ارزشمندی با نام «خانه‏داری»، الگویی جایگزین ارائه می‏شود که با خصوصیات خانوادۀ ایرانی کمی سازگارتر است. در این تحقیق، از روش پیمایشی و مطالعۀ میدانی استفاده شده است. روش جمع‏آوری اطلاعات مبتنی بر نمونه‏گیری تصادفی ساده از زنان متأهل و مراجعه به واحدهای انتخابی بوده است. بر این اساس، تابع عرضۀ خانه‏داری که از الگو به‌دست می‏آید، با استفاده از نمونه‏ای شامل 409 زن متأهل ساکن شهر تهران با دست‌کم 35 سال، بر‌اساس الگوی رگرسیونی سانسور‌شده، با در نظر گرفتن توزیع لجستیک برای جزء خطای رگرسیون و به روش حداکثر راست‌نمایی تخمین زده شده است. نتایج از این حکایت دارد که درآمد، آموزش، اشتغال و سن زنان و همچنین درآمد خانواده و مدت زندگی زناشویی همگی بر میزان خانه‏داری زنان اثر منفی دارند، اما تعداد فرزندان اثر مثبت را نشان می‏دهد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

اقتصاد

عنوان مقاله [English]

Housework supply function of married women in Tehran

نویسنده [English]

Vahid Mehrbani

Assistant Professor, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

چکیده [English]

Conventional economic theory neglects home production and provides services within household because what is produced and consumed within households has not economic value and hence does not enter the national accounts. The main reason of such ignorance is that the home products are not transmitted from market. The history of this viewpoint dates back to the advent of industrialization into the capitalism. Family is a framework for preparation of many worthy commodities in which welfare of individuals is determined while women attend the core of this process. Some economists in the second half of the twentieth century attempted to incorporate housework into the neoclassical theory of labor-leisure choice. Accordingly, this paper also presents an alternative model to analyze such valuable activity called "housework" in which characteristics of Iranian family is more compatible including evident implications. The model leads to a supply function of housework that represents the housework as a negative function of female's wage rate and a positive function of husband's wage and the wife's share from husband's earnings. The method of research is gathering data of married women and analyzing evidence according to econometric equations. These data have been gathered by questionnaire. The housework supply function has been estimated by using a sample that includes 409 married women who reside in Tehran and are at least 35 years old. The estimation is based on logistic distribution function and Maximum Likelihood method. Results suggest that earnings, education, employment and age of women besides family income and marriage duration have negative effect on housework but number of children shows positive impact. As a whole, factors that make market opportunities more attractive tend to lessen the time devoted to housework and vice versa.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

allocation of time
earnings
home production
housework
Women

مراجع

[1] زارتسکی، ایلای (1390). سرمایه‏داری، خانواده و زندگی شخصی، ترجمۀ منیژه نجم‏عراقی، تهران: نی.

[2] مرکز آمار ایران، سال‌نامۀ آماری استان تهران، سال 1390.

[3] مهربانی، وحید (1394). تحلیل اقتصادی آموزش، تهران: سمت.

[4] Becker, G. S. (1965). “A Theory of the Allocation of Time”, The Economic Journal, 75(299), pp 493-517.

[5] Becker, G. S. (1974). “On the Relevance of the New Economics of the Family”, The American Economic Review, 64(2), pp 317-319.

[6] Becker, G. S. (1993). A Treatise on the Family, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

[7] Borjas, G. J. (2013). Labor Economics, New York: McGraw-Hill Companies.

[8] Bryant, W. K. & Zick, C. D. (2006). The Economic Organization of the Household, New York: Cambridge University Press.

[9] Eisner, R. (1988). “Extended Accounts for National Income and Product”, Journal of Economic Literature, 26(4), pp 1611-1684.

[10] Gronau, R. (1977). “Leisure, Home Production, and Work--the Theory of the Allocation of Time Revisited”, The Journal of Political Economy, 85(6), pp 1099-1123.

[11] Gronau, R. (1980). “Home Production-A Forgotten Industry”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 62(3), pp 408-416.

[12] Gupta, S. (2007). “Autonomy, Dependence, or Display? The Relationship between Married Women’s Earnings and Housework”, Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, pp 399-417.

[13] Hersch, J. & Stratton, L. S. (1994). “Housework, Wages, and the Division of Housework Time for Employed Spouses”, The American Economic Review, 84(2), pp 120-125.

[14] Hersch, J. & Stratton, L. S. (1997). “Housework, Fixed Effects, and Wages of Married Workers”, The Journal of Human Resources, 32(2), pp. 285-307.

[15] Hersch, J. & Stratton, L. S. (2002). “Housework and Wages”, The Journal of Human Resources, 37(1), pp 217-229.

[16] Israel, G. D. (2009). “Determining Sample Size”, University of Florida, Department of Agricultural Education and Communication.

[17] Jones, C. (1983). “The Mobilization of Women's Labor for Cash Crop Production: A Game Theoretic Approach”, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 65(5), pp 1049-1054.

[18] Kan, M. Y. (2008). “Does Gender Trump Money? Housework Hours of Husbands and Wives in Britain”, Work, Employment and Society, 22(1), pp 45–66.

[19] Keng, S. H. and Lin, C. H. (2005), “Wives’ Value of Time and Food Consumed Away from Home in Taiwan”, Asian Economic Journal, 19(3), pp 319-334.

[20] Kooreman, P. and Wunderink, S. (1997). The Economics of Household Behaviour, New York: ST. Martin's Press.

[21] Lundberg, S. and Pollak, R. A. (1996). “Bargaining and Distribution in Marriage”, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10(4), pp 139-158.

[22] Michael, R. T. & Becker, G. S. (1973). “On the New Theory of Consumer Behavior”, The Swedish Journal of Economics, 75(4), pp 378-396.

[23] Muth, R. F. (1966). “Household Production and Consumer Demand Functions”, Econometrica, 34(3), pp 699-708.

[24] Park, J. L. and Capps, O. (1997). “Demand for Prepared Meals by U.S. Households”, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 79(3), pp 814-824.

[25] Schneider, D. (2009). “Market Income and Household Work: New Tests of Gender Performance Theory”, Princeton University.

[26] Solberg, E. J. and Wong, D. C. (1992). “Family Time Use: Leisure, Home Production, Market Work, and Work Related Travel”, The Journal of Human Resources, 27(3), pp 485-510.

[27] South, S. J. & Spitze, G. (1994). “Housework in Marital and Nonmarital Households”, American Sociological Review, 59(3), pp 327-347.

[28] Stratton, L. S. (2003). “Gains from Trade and Specialization: The Division of Work in Married Couple Households”, In Women, Family and Work: Writings in the Economics of Gender, Edited by Karine S. Moe, Malden: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

زن در توسعه و سیاست

تابع عرضۀ خانه‌داری زنان متأهل در شهر تهران

مراجع

مراجع

دوره 14، شماره 2
تیر 1395
صفحه 141-160

تابع عرضۀ خانه‌داری زنان متأهل در شهر تهران

مراجع

مراجع

دوره 14، شماره 2تیر 1395صفحه 141-160

دوره 14، شماره 2
تیر 1395
صفحه 141-160