نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

استادیار، گروه مبانی نظری جنسیت، پژوهشکدۀ زن و خانواده، قم، ایران.

چکیده

با وجود اهمیت عدالت در فقه سیاسی-اجتماعی، نظریه‌پردازی‌ها باید به نظام‌سازی یا ساختارهای روندساز منجر شوندف اما در رویکرد اسلامی مطرح و تقویت نشده‌اند. از جمله مهم‌ترین مباحث عدالت، پردازش نظریه‌ای است که شامل ابعاد نظری و عملی روشن به‌مثابۀ راهبرد ادارۀ جامعه است. این ابعاد اگرچه در مطالعات دو دهۀ اخیر حوزۀ عدالت مورد توجه پژوهشگران داخلی قرار گرفته‌اند، نیازمند کاوش بیشتر و تمرکز روی موضوعات خرد هستند. این مقاله با هدف تقویت این ابعاد و ضرورت‌ها به طرح ایدۀ خود می‌پردازد و به‌دلیل اهمیت حقوق و مزایای اجتماعی زنان، میدان بررسی و تطبیقات خود را در موضوع عدالت برای زنان قرار داده است. پرسش اصلی مقاله ناظر به مهم‌ترین چالش نظری و عملی عدالت است که در پاسخ ملاحظۀ نظری به چالش معیار نابرابری و ملاحظۀ عملی به دو بحث ادراک‌سنجی و شاخص‌سازی برای عدالت پرداخته است. روش مقاله پس از جمع‌آوری داده‌های لازم، تحلیل محتوا، و مقاله اسنادی و بنیادی است. گفتنی است این مقاله برگرفته از یک کلان طرح دربارۀ عدالت جنسیتی است. مطابق نتایج، نابرابری به‌عنوان مهم‌ترین مسئله در مطالعات عدالت، نیازمند تعیین معیار است. چندمعیارگی در نظریۀ عدالت اسلامی قابل‌دفاع است. تفاوت میان مردان و زنان به‌عنوان بخشی از معیارها با سیاست‌های جانب‌دارانه در راستای حمایت از خانواده، مادرانگی، زنانگی و فردیت زنان مورد توجه قرار می‌گیرد. عدالت، امری راهبردی برای تنظیم روابط افراد با یکدیگر از حوزۀ خانوادگی تا حوزۀ اجتماعی است و نیازمند طراحی معیارها، اصول و اهداف، شاخص‌سازی و ادراک‌سنجی است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Theoretical and practical requirements about justice: justice and women

نویسنده [English]

  • Fariba Alasvand

Assistant Professor, Department of Theoretical gender studies, Woman and Family Institute, Qom, Iran.

چکیده [English]

The issue of justice is one of the wide-ranging and challenging issues that, despite the complex texts about justice in Western sources, the Islamic approach to it is weak. Studies show that despite the importance of justice in political and social jurisprudence, theoretical dimensions that lead to systematization or trend-setting structures have not been raised and strengthened in this approach. Except for some of the books and articles that have been published in the last two decades and presented good comparative studies that can inspire new researches, most of these studies are still involved in issues such as knowing or not knowing the rules of justice, justice as a criterion for Friday and congregational imamate., the difference between the sharia and customary meaning of justice, criticism of women's rights and duties with the measure of justice and the like. Therefore, a research that proposes to strengthen those theoretical dimensions of justice that leads to pragmatism and structuring about it is necessary. Therefore, this article aims to strengthen this dimension and to present the necessities that are necessary in organizing a pragmatic theory of justice, and because in the last century, one of the challenges of justice, especially its Islamic approach, rights and benefits Social is for women, the field of investigation and comparisons has been placed on the issue of justice for women.
Weighing each ruling with justice means to consider justice as the criterion of all of them or the legislative goal of all of them. Although such a statement is not approved, it is necessary to fill the empty space of mandatory rules with fair laws and legislate fair laws in the administration of the country and governance. As some authors believe, if the rulings in the laws of the Islamic Republic are in accordance with the explicit text of the Qur'an and frequent hadiths, they are the same revelation and cannot be criticized by the standard of justice, but in the case of other laws, if the revelation is silent, they are evaluated by the standard of justice. As a result, if justice is a criterion in some of the laws of the country, among the most important topics in this regard is the processing of the theory of justice, which includes clear theoretical and practical aspects as a strategy for managing society. Although these dimensions have been the focus of domestic researchers in the studies of the last two decades, they need to be explored more and focused on micro-issues. In the path of transition from the praise of justice in its religious studies to practical theoretical processing, one should know what is the most important theoretical and practical challenge of justice in this field. This is the main question in this article. To answer this question, the author's effort is to present one theoretical consideration and two practical considerations in the theorizing of justice centered on women. The theoretical consideration deals with the challenge of the inequality criterion, and the practical consideration deals with the two issues of perception measurement and indexing for justice, and in all cases, it focuses on the issue of women. After collecting the necessary data, the method of the article is content analysis and a documentary and fundamental article.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • criterion
  • gender
  • index
  • justice
  • women
Alasvand, F. (2013). Woman in the Islam. Qom: Women and Family Research Institute. (In Persian)
Alasvand, F. (2019). Feasibility of Gender Justice in Theories of Justice: Western Philosophers in the Twentieth Century. Gender and Family Studies, 7(1), 11-31. (In Persian)
Alasvand, F. (2020). Conceptual Analysis of Equality and Inequality Criteria in Justice and Gender Justice Theories. Tehran University Public Law Studies Quarterly, 52(3).. https://doi.org/10.22059/jplsq.2020.289488.2173 (In Persian).
Aristotle (2020). Nicomachean ethics = Nikomachische. Translated by: M. H. Lotfi. Tehran: Tarhe No. (In Persian)
Bastani, Suosan., & Khosravi Dehaghi, Kouthar. (2020). Obstacles and Challenges of Policy-making based on Gender Equity. Social Problems of Iran, 10(2), 29-57. http://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.24766933.1398.10.2.3.7 (In Persian)
Comprehensive Sexuality Education. (2016). unfpa. Retrieved from
Daneshpajooh, M. (2012). Identification of law (science of law, legal rule and the relation of law with justice, morality and religion). Tehran: Jangal. (In Persian)
Ernest Hilgard, Rechard Chatman Atkinson & Rita L. Atkinson ,  (2005). Hilgard's introduction to psychology. Translated by M. N. Barahani. Tehran: Roshdpress. (In Persian)
Hayek. F. A. (2011). The constitution of liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago, Bruce Caldwell press.
Human Rights, Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity (A/HRC/27/L.27/Rev.1). (2014). Undocs. Retrieved from https://undocs.org/A/HRC/27/L.27/Rev.1
Important events and developments of women after the Islamic revolution in 7 major areas (2022). kayhan. Retrieved from
Incheon Declaration and Framework for Action for the implementation of Sustainable Development Goal 4. (2015). UNESCO. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000245656
Iranian National Commission for UNESCO (2016).Transforming our world, 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Translated by M. Pirouz Nik. (In Persian)
Kalantari, A., & Faghih Imani, F. (2013). Meta-Analysis of Conducted Researches about “Inequality of Genders. Woman in Culture and Art, 5(1), 123-140. (In Persian)
Kharazmi, Z. (2022). Women and the UN Documents. Qom:Women and Family Research Institute. (In Persian)
Kirp David, Mark Yudof, Marlene Franks Strong, (1986). Gender justice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Konow, J. (2003). Which Is the Fairest One of All? A Positive Analysis of Justice Theory. Journal of Economic Literature, 41(4), 1188–1239, DOI: 10.1257/002205103771800013 · Source: RePEc. 
Masjedi, F. (2002). Measuring the development of countries. Economic Researches of Iran, 4(10), 67-103. (In Persian)
Mohammadi, H. (2017). A Critical Analysis of Ethics Philosophy in Public Administration and Governance. Islam and Management, 6(11), 77-98. https://dx.doi.org/10.30471/im.2017.1439 (In Persian)
Mohebi, F. (2019). Woman & family in the upstream documets of the islamic republic of iran. Tehran: Social Cultural Council of Women and Family. (In Persian)
Motahhari, M. (1973). A collection of works by master Shahid Motahari. Qom: Sadra Publications. (In Persian)
Motahhari, M. (1983). An overview of the basics of Islamic economics. Tehran: Hekmat Publications. (In Persian)
Motahhari, M. (2010). Divine Justice. Tehran: Sadra Publications. (In Persian)
Motahhari, M. (2011). Professor Motahari's notes. Tehran: Sadra Publications. (In Persian)
Netherlands Population (2023). Worldometers. Retrieved from
Nozick, R. (1979). Anachy, state and utopi. Londen: Basil Blakewell.
Paighami, A., Torabzadeh Jahromi, M. S., & Sajjadieh, S. A. (2016). Essays on Social Justice. Tehran: Imam Sadiq University. (In Persian)
Plato (1977). The Republic. Translated by: D. Lee. Penguin Books.
Rice, F. Ph. (2008). Human development: A life - span approach. Translated by: M. Foroughan. Tehran: Arjamand. (In Persian)
Rowls, J. (1990). A theory of justice. Harvard: Harvard College.
Sandel M. J. (1998). Liberalism and the limits of justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
Sen Amartya (2009). The Idea of Justice. Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Tabataba'i, S. M. H. (2011). Al-Mizan fi tafsir al-Qur'an. Beirut: Alami. (In Persian)
Vaezi, A. (2009). Criticism of theories of justice. Qom: Imam Khomeini Educational & Research Institute. (In Persian)