نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار، گروه اقتصاد، دانشکدۀ اقتصاد، مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه یزد، یزد، ایران.

2 کارشناس ارشد، گروه اقتصاد، دانشکدۀ اقتصاد، مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه یزد، یزد، ایران.

3 دانشجوی دکتری اقتصاد، گروه اقتصاد، دانشکدۀ اقتصاد، مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه یزد، یزد، ایران

4 استادیار گروه اقتصاد، دانشکدۀ علوم انسانی، دانشگاه بجنورد، بجنورد، ایران.

10.22059/jwdp.2024.376579.1008449

چکیده

در دنیای کنونی، موقعیت‌های اجتماعی-اقتصادی زنان و مردان متحول شده است، اما کماکان رگه‌هایی از ایدئولوژی‌های مردانه به‌ویژه در کشورهای توسعه‌نیافته و درحال‌توسعه مشاهده می‌شود. گروهی معتقدند بقای این نابرابری فرصت‌ها به‌لحاظ تاریخی و نهادی، به نقش دولت‌ها به‌عنوان سپری که از منافع مردان پاسداری می‌کرده مربوط می‌شود. به همین دلیل، پژوهش حاضر با دو روش تجزیۀ واریانس و جنگل تصادفی و به‌کارگیری بیش از 2500 مشاهده (94 کشور طی دورۀ زمانی 1970-2020) به بررسی نقش ساختار سیاسی و قدرت در نابرابری‌های جنسیتی می‌پردازد. بدین‌منظور از شاخص‌های حقوق سیاسی و آزادی‌های مدنی و همچنین ابعاد شش‌گانۀ فرهنگی هافستد استفاده شده است. براساس نتایج تجزیۀ واریانس، دو بعد ساختار سیاسی دموکراتیک (حقوق سیاسی و آزادی‌های مدنی) در توضیح تفاوت میان توسعۀ جنسیتی و نابرابری جنسیتی کشورها نقش معنی‌داری داشتند و به‌ویژه تفاوت اصلی بین کشورهای غیرآزاد و نیمه‌آزاد با کشورهای آزاد است. یافته‌های جنگل تصادفی نیز تأیید کرد که تأکید بر آزادی‌های مدنی و حقوق سیاسی برای برخورداری از جامعه‌ای با تبعیض جنسیتی محدود، امری ضروری است. در مقابل، نتایج مربوط به نقش و اهمیت ویژگی‌های فرهنگی، بسیار شکننده است و بسته به نمونه یا شاخص جنسیتی مورد استفاده تغییر خواهد کرد. سیاست‌گذاران با یک مبادلۀ سیاستی میان آزادی و رفع تبعیض مواجه نیستند، بلکه یک انتخاب همه یا هیچ دارند و تلاش برای نظام سیاسی آزاد و کاهش نابرابری جنسیتی و بهبود توسعۀ انسانی دو روی یک سکه هستند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Role of Political Freedoms in Gender Inequalities: Global Evidence

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mehdi Hajamini 1
  • Ameneh Zare 2
  • Abolfazl Dehghani 3
  • Masoud Nikooghadam 4

1 Associate Professor in Economics, Department of Economics, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran.

2 Master’s Degree in Economics, Department of Economics, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran.

3 PhD Candidate of Economics, Department of Economics, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran.

4 Assistant professor of Economics, University of Bojnord, Bojnord, Iran.

چکیده [English]

In today’s world, the socio-economic statuses of women and men have evolved; however, the effects of masculine ideologies are still evident, particularly in developing and underdeveloped countries. The function of governments as a shield that protects the interests of men is widely believed to be historically and institutionally related to this inequality of opportunities. As a result, the present paper has investigated the role of political structure and power on gender inequalities using two methods of variance analysis and random forest, as well as over 2500 observations from 94 countries between 1970 and 2020. For this purpose, Hofstede’s cultural dimensions and political rights and civil liberties indicators were implemented. Based on the variance analysis, two dimensions of democratic political structure were found to be significantly involved in the explanation of the disparity between gender development and gender inequality, particularly the primary difference between not-free and partly-free countries and free countries. In order to experience a society with minimal gender discrimination, it is imperative to prioritize civil liberties and political rights, as the random forest results also confirmed. However, the results concerning cultural characteristics are exceedingly susceptible to fluctuations and are contingent upon the sample or gender index . A policy trade-off between gender freedom and development is not presented to policymakers in developing and underdeveloped countries; rather, they are presented with an all-or-nothing choice. Reducing gender inequality and achieving a free political system are two aspects of the same coin.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Political Freedom
  • Gender Inequality
  • Gender Development
  • Hofstede's cultural Dimensions
Andersson, M. A., & Harnois, C. E. (2020). Higher exposure, lower vulnerability? The curious case of education, gender discrimination, and Women’s health. Social Science & Medicine, 246, 112780.  ‌  http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112780   
Bando, R. (2019). Evidence-based gender equality policy and pay in Latin America and the Caribbean: progress and challenges. Latin American Economic Review28(1), 10.‌ https://doi.org/10.1186/s40503-019-0075-3
Bavetta, S., Navarra, P., & Maimone, D. (2014). Freedom and the pursuit of happiness: An economic and political perspective. Cambridge University Press.‌
Bayeh, E. (2016). The role of empowering women and achieving gender equality to the sustainable development of Ethiopia. Pacific Science Review B: Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(1), 37-42.      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psrb.2016.09.013
Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine learning, 45, 5-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1010950718922
Bukhari, F. Y., & Ramzan, M. (2013). Gender discrimination: A myth or truth women status in Pakistan. Journal of Business and Management8(2), 88-97.‌ http://dx.doi.org/10.9790/487X-0828897
Chaboki, O. (2003). Education and gender in Iran. Women’s Studies Sociological and Psychological, 1(2), 70-100. (In Persian)
Charles, I. E., & Ikenna, M. A. (2009). Electoral process and gender discrimination in Nigeria: a case study of 2003 and 2007 general elections. Journal of Sustainable Development in Africa10(4), 113-128.‌
Dahlum, S., Knutsen, C. H., & Mechkova, V. (2022). Women’s political empowerment and economic growth. World Development156, 105822.‌ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.105822
DeCoster, J. (2006). Testing group differences using t-tests, ANOVA, and nonparametric measures.
Desai, V., & Potter, R. (2013). The companion to development studies. Translated by Ali Khalandi (2020). Tehran: Nahadgara Publication. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203528983 (In Persian)
Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and Freedom. Translated by: Gh. R. Rashidi. Tehran: Nashreney. https://doi.org/10.7312/blau17412-074 (In Persian)
Gastil, R. D. (1987). Freedom in the World Westport.‌ https://doi.org/10.2307/1955962
Gonzales, M. C., Jain-Chandra, M. S., Kochhar, M. K., & Newiak, M. M. (2015b). Fair play: More equal laws boost female labor force participation. International Monetary Fund.‌ http://dx.doi.org/10.5089/9781498354424.006
Gonzales, M. C., Jain-Chandra, M. S., Kochhar, M. K., Newiak, M. M., & Zeinullayev, M. T. (2015a). Catalyst for change: Empowering women and tackling income inequality. International Monetary Fund.‌ http://dx.doi.org/10.5089/9781513533384.006
Gunduz, C. (2004). Human rights and development: The World Bank’s need for a consistent approach. Development Studies Institute Working Paper, (04-49).‌
Havelková, B. (2010, January). The legal notion of gender equality in the Czech Republic. In Women's Studies International Forum (Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 21-29). Pergamon.‌ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2009.11.009
Hosseininezhad, S., Safdar, S., & Luu, L. A. N. (2022). Perceptions of gender roles and freedom among Iranian international students in Hungary. In Women's Studies International Forum (Vol. 90, p. 102555). Pergamon.‌ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2021.102555
Iqbal, H., Afzal, S., & Inayat, M. (2012). Gender discrimination: implications for Pakistan security. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science1(4), 16-25.‌ https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-0141625
Kaltenborn, M., Krajewski, M., & Kuhn, H. (2020). Sustainable development goals and human rights (p. 239). Springer Nature.    http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30469-0
Kenworthy, L., & Malami, M. (1999). Gender inequality in political representation: A worldwide comparative analysis. Social Forces78(1), 235-268.‌ https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/78.1.235
Lauri, M., Carbin, M., & Linander, I. (2023, July). The rise of carceral feminism in Sweden: Analysing political debate and policy on men’s violence against women. In Women's Studies International Forum (Vol. 99, p. 102780). Pergamon.‌ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2023.102780
Makama, G. A. (2013). Patriarchy and gender inequality in Nigeria: The way forward. European Scientific Journal9(17).‌
Matthew, O., Adeniji, A., Osabohien, R., Olawande, T., & Atolagbe, T. (2020). Gender inequality, maternal mortality and inclusive growth in Nigeria. Social Indicators Research, 147, 763-780.‌     https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11205-019-02185-x
McClave, J.T., & Sincich, T. (2016). Statistics. Pearson Education.
Meagher, K., Attal, B., & Patel, P. (2021). Exploring the role of gender and women in the political economy of health in armed conflict: A narrative review. Globalization and Health, 17, 1-9. ‌ https://globalizationandhealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12992-021-00738-9
 
Milazzo, A., & Goldstein, M. (2019). Governance and women’s economic and political participation: Power inequalities, formal constraints and norms. The World Bank Research Observer34(1), 34-64.   ‌ https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lky006
Mill, J. S. (1859). On Liberty. Translated by: M. Sanaei. Tehran: Roshangaran Publication. (In Persian)
Mill, J. S. (1866). The subjection of women. Translated by Aladdin Tabatabai (2011). Tehran: Hermes Publication. (In Persian)
Millns, S. (2007). Gender equality, citizenship, and the EU’s constitutional future. European Law Journal, 13(2), 218-237.‌   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00365.x
Movahed, M. A. (2014). If anyone is at homeUniversal Declaration of Human Rights. Tehran: Karnameh Publication. (in Persian)
Nikooghadam, M., Gholizadeh Amirabad, M., & Khoshnoodi, A. (2019). The effect of women empowerment on the democracy development. Women in Development and Politics, 16(4), 621-640.
Nouri Naeeni, M. S. (2006). Development, water or mirage. Tehran: Nashreney. (In Persian)
Pateman, C. (1988). The sexual contract stanford university press. Palo Alto, California.‌
Petesch, P., & Badstue, L. (2020). Gender norms and poverty dynamics in 32 villages of South Asia. International Journal of Community Well-Being3(3), 289-310.‌ https://doi.org/10.1007/s42413-019-00047-5
Pishgahifard, Z., Zohdi Goharpour, M., & Abedinirad, A. (2014). The Study of gender empowerment functions in development of women’s political participation case: Countries of the Central Asia and the Caucasus. Central Eurasia Studies, 7(2), 265-289. https://doi.org/10.22059/jcep.2014.52979 (In Persian)
Ponthieux, S., & Meurs, D. (2015). Gender inequality. In Handbook of income distribution (Vol. 2, pp. 981-1146). Elsevier.‌ https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-59428-0.00013-8
 
Rietveld, C. A., & Patel, P. C. (2022). Gender inequality and the entrepreneurial gender gap: Evidence from 97 countries (2006–2017). Journal of Evolutionary Economics32(4), 1205-1229.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Translated by: S. M. S. Nouri Naeeni. Tehran: Nashreney. (in Persian)
Sen, A. (2006). Identity and violence: The illusion of destiny. Translated by: F. Majlesi. Tehran: Payan Publication. (In Persian)
Shastri, A. (2014). Gender inequality and women discrimination. IOSR Journal of Humanities and social science, 19(11), 27-30.
Šidák, Z. (1967). Rectangular confidence regions for the means of multivariate normal distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 62(318), 626-633. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1967.10482935
Stroup, M. D. (2008). Separating the influence of capitalism and democracy on women’s well-being. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization67(3-4), 560-572.‌ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2007.08.005
Weldon, S. L., Lusvardi, A., Kelly-Thompson, K., & Forester, S. (2023, July). Feminist waves, global activism, and gender violence regimes: Genealogy and impact of a global wave. In Women’s Studies International Forum (Vol. 99, p. 102781). Pergamon.
Yount, K. M., Cheong, Y. F., Khan, Z., Bergenfeld, I., Kaslow, N., & Clark, C. J. (2022). Global measurement of intimate partner violence to monitor sustainable development goal 5. BMC public health22(1), 465.‌    https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-12822-9
Zolfaghari, V. (2021). Women’s political representation and its relation with corruption in the political life cycle (with emphasis on the role of international media). International Media Research Letters, 6(1), 287-315. (In Persian)