نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار بخش جامعه‌شناسی دانشگاه شیراز

2 کارشناس ارشد جامعه‌شناسی دانشگاه شیراز

چکیده

مطالعة حاضر با هدف بررسی جامعه‌شناختی مفهوم پول برای زنان در خانواده با تمرکز بر زنان متأهل شهر تبریز انجام گرفته است. برای این منظور، از رهیافت پول‌های خاص زلیزر به‌منزلۀ چارچوب نظری استفاده شده است. این تحقیق با تکنیک پیمایشی انجام گرفته و حجم نمونه شامل 400 نفر از زنان متأهل شهر تبریز است. نتایج تحقیق نشان داد که برای 8/61درصد از زنان مطالعه‌شده مفهوم پول خانواده‌محور، 5/31درصد خودمحور/خانواده‌محور و 7/6درصد خودمحور است. بین متغیرهای میزان تحصیلات، وضعیت اشتغال، میزان درآمد، پایگاه اقتصادی و اجتماعی، و الگوهای تخصیص پول در خانواده با مفهوم پول برای زنان در خانواده رابطة معناداری وجود دارد، اما بین متغیر سن و مفهوم پول برای زنان در خانواده رابطة معناداری مشاهده نشد. نتایج حاصل از رگرسیون گام‌به‌گام نشان داد که از بین متغیرهای وارد‌شده در رگرسیون چندمتغیره به ترتیب متغیرهای میزان درآمد زن، پایگاه اقتصادی و اجتماعی، و وضعیت اشتغال باقی ماندند که در مجموع 4/36درصد از تغییرات واریانس متغیر وابسته را تبیین کردند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Sociological study of the concept of money for women in the family (Case study: Tabriz married women)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Jahangir Jahangiri 1
  • Vahid Kashafinia 2

1 Assistant Professor of Sociology, Shiraz University, Iran

2 M.A. in Sociology, Shiraz University , Iran

چکیده [English]

The main purpose of this research is to study the concept of money for women in the family, in sociological prespective. The case sudy of the research was Tabriz married women. In doing so, we have used Viviena Zelizer’s Special monies approach as theoritical framework. In order to ghather data we have used the survey technique. This study has been done upon 400 married women in the Tabriz city, Iran. The findings of research show that the concept of money for 61.8 percent of women is family-oriented, for 31.5 percent is self-family-oriented, and for 6.7 percent of women is self-oriented. Also, results show that variables edjucation, employment status, income, social and economic status, money allocation system in family have a significant relationship with concept of money for women in the family, but there is no relationship between variable age and independent variable. The result of stepwise regression showed that three factors explain the variance of the total by 36.4 percent, respectively.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • concept of money
  • married women
  • sociology of money
  • special monies approach
  • Tabriz
1] Bachmann, L. (2011). “Money of her own: women’s struggle for emancipation through their dealings with money”, Journal of Comparative Research in Anthropology and Sociology, Volume 2, Number 1.
[2] Baker, W., & Jimerson, J. (1992). “The Sociology of Money”, the American Behavioral Scientist; Jul/Aug 1992; 35, pp678-693.
[3] Belk, R. & Wallendorf, M. (1990). “The Sacred Meaning of Money”, Journal of Economic Psychology, 1990, Vol (11).
[4] Burgoyne, C. (1990). “Money in Marriage: How Patterns of Allocation both Reflect and Conceal Power”, The Sociological Review, Vol. 38, Issue 4, pp. 634–665.
[5] Deflem, M. (2003). “The Sociology of the Sociology of Money”, Journal of Classical Sociology, Vol (3), pp 67-96.
[6] Dobeck, N., & Elliott, E. (2007). Money, Greenwood Press.
[7] Dodd, N. (1994). The Sociology of Money: Economics, Reason and Contemporary Society. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
[8] Elizabeth, V. (2001). “Managing Money, Managing Coupledom: a Critical Examination of Cohabitant’s Money Management Practices”, The Sociological Review, Vol. 49, Issue 3, pp 389–411.
[9] Giddens, Anthony. (1990). the Consequences of the Modernity, London: Polity Press.
[10] Goldman, E. (1911). Marriage and Love, New York: Mother Earth Publishing Association.
[11] Hart, K. (1986). “Heads or Tails? Two Sides of the Coin”, Man, New Series, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp 637-656
[12] Ingham, G. (2006). Chapter Moneyin: The Cambridge Dictionary of Sociology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[13] Ingham, G. (1998). “On the Underdevelopment of the Sociology of Money”, Acta Sociologica 1998, Vol 41.
[14] Marx, K. (1858) 1973. Grundrisse. New York: Vintage.
[15] Marx, K. (1867) 1984. Capital, Vol 1. Edited by Friedrich Engels, New York: International.
[16] Maurer, B. (2006). “The Anthropology of Money”, the Annual Review of Anthropology 2006. 35, pp 15-36.
[17] Nyman, C and Sandra Dema.(2007).An Overview: Research on Couples and Money” in Janet Stocks, Capitolina Díaz and Björn Halleröd (eds.), Modern Couples Sharing Money, Sharing Life, London: Palgrave MacMillan.
[18] Pahl, J. (1990). “Household Spending, Personal Spending and the Control of Money in Marriage”, Sociology, February 1990 vol. 24 no. 1, pp 119-138.
[19] Pahl, J. (1995). “His money, her money: Recent research on financial organisation in marriage, Journal of Economic Psychology 16.
[20] Vogler, C Jan Pahl. (1994). “Money, Power, and Inequality within Marriage”, The Sociological Review, Volume 42, Issue 2, , pp 263–288.
[21] Weber, M. (1922). 1978 Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretative Sociology, edited by Guenther Roth and Claus Wittch, Berkeley: University of California Press.
[22] Woolley, F. (2003). “Control over Money in Marriage”, in Shoshana Grossbard-Shechtman (ed.), Marriage and the Economy: Theory and Evidence from Advanced Industrial Societies, Cambridge University Press.
[23] Zelizer, V. (1979). Morals and Markets: The Development of life Insurance in the United State. New Brunswick: Transaction Books.
[24] Zelizer, V. (1989). “The Social Meaning of Money: Special Monies”, the American Journal of Sociology, Vol 95, No.2 (Sep., 1989), pp. 342-377.
[25] Zelizer, V. (2005). The Purchase of Intimacy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.